Header.JPG

Boulton and Paul P.6 and P.9

For a description of the format and data included in Production Tables, see here.

Produced Variants

P.6
 
Two seat biplane full-scale experimental aircraft to examine different aerofoil sections. Utilised a large number of Sopwith Camel parts. 90 h.p. RAF 1a powerplant driving a four-blade propeller.
P.9 Two seat touring biplane, a larger version of the P.6, 6ft longer with a 2ft 6in increase in span. 90 h.p. RAF 1a powerplant.


Production List  

P.6

Page Top 

C/n Initial Registration Notes
 1 aircraft built by the Aircraft Department of Boulton and Paul Ltd, Mousehold, Norwich, Norfolk. First flew late 1918.
 P.6/1  K-120 / G-EACJ  Originally X.25. Retained by Boulton and Paul Ltd.
Total Production   1




P.9

Page Top 

C/n Initial Registration Notes
 8 aircraft built by the Aircraft Department of Boulton and Paul Ltd, Mousehold, Norwich, Norfolk. Built between May 1919 and September 1922.
 P9/1  none  To Australia mid 1919   by Lt. Long, became G-AUDB. To Victorian Flying Services.
 P9/2  G-EAPD  Retained by Boulton and Paul Ltd as demonstrator.
 P9/3  G-AUBT  To Life Assurance Co. of Australia, Melbourne, via distributor Aviation Ltd.
 P9/4  G-EASJ  To Brig. J.G. weir, Renfrew. To John Wilkinson of Young's Field, Cape Towrn in 1929 as G-UAAM, later ZS-AAM.
 P9/5  G-AUCT  To F.J.Barnes, Hamilton, Victoria in Apr 1922, via distributor Aviation Ltd. Crashed and regn cancelled 27 Jun 1922; reportedly rebuilt as the Jones Wonga
     Monoplane.
 P9/6  G-EAWS  Retained by Boulton and Paul Ltd as demonstrator.   Rebuilt in 1930 by Ernest 'Tom' Worsell of Sevenoaks with a 10 h.p. Singer water-cooled powerplant.
 P9/7  G-AUCP  To R.S. Falkiner, Groongal NSW, in February 1920, via distributor Aviation Ltd.
 P9/8  G-EBEQ  Initially retained by Boulton and Paul Ltd as demonstrator, to Frank Soden 10 September 1926. Crashed in Switzerland in 1929 and rebuilt as CH-259.
Total Production   8




Production Summary

Page Top 

All Aircraft By Type
Type Built New Conv. Canc'd Total
 P.6 1     1
 P.9 8     8
  9 0 0  


Notes
  1. Per summary details given in AB Archive [3], both P.9/1 and P.9/2 were initially registered G-EAPD. Were they in fact the same aircraft, was the registration applied twice or was it simply never carried by P.9/1 and reused on P.9/2 after the former was exported?
     
  2. Alec Brew [2] states that "it was not the company policy to allocate c/ns and that when Long's aircraft had to be registered in Australia after June 1921 it was retrospectively given c/n P.9.1 as it was the first built."

Production References
  1. Air Britain Archive 2002/1 (Air-Britain Publications)
  2. Air Britain Archive 2002/2 (Air-Britain Publications)
  3. Air Britain Archive 2002/4 (Air-Britain Publications)

top

V1.4.4 Created by Roger Moss. Last updated August 2020